MD: Lawsuit – Sex offender requirements applied retroactively

BALTIMORE — A class-action lawsuit claims the rights of at least 800 people listed on the Maryland Sex Offender Registry have been violated. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Baltimore City Circuit Court, says the state retroactively increased the length of time certain sex offenders had to remain on the registry.

The Maryland Declaration of Rights prohibits laws that retroactively criminalize an act or impose a more severe penalty than was set when the act was committed. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Janice see what you and the RSOL team started!!! I hope you’re proud of yourself (humor). Attorneys are starting to see the gold lining attached to all these sex offender registries and all their blatant in your face violations of not just Constitutional rights but human rights as well.

Yeah is this the kind of bs were going to face if CA created a tiered registry.

The main thing is that a tier registry is retroactive so your time duration should start from a date back in time. You may be removed very quickly, I would think depending where you are personally at time of passage unless they say the clock starts when the law passes. Just think having to wait another 20+ years to come off…huh? Well lets look at it this way, then I will be guaranteed another 20 years of life…I should thank them, such generosity.

YOU ALL DO KNOW that Janice is comin to Texas next month to speak at the RSOL Conference , yes ?
And Nancy Forster from Maryland is also comin to Texas to speak. And Larry Neely of NewMexRSOL is there every year.

Now Nancy and Larry are the ones engineering this Maryland thing for the last 3-4 years. 1000 freed; now shootin for 800 more ! Soooo…HERE’S THE THING : At the Texas meeting, Nancy is bound to ask Janice, “So what do your CA RSOL people think of what we all are doin here in Maryland ? But at this point Janice can only say, ” Well, we posted it, but CA RSOL people hardly commented on it all….”

HELP JANICE !! Put some COMMENTS here ! This way you’ll HELP JANICE have ANSWERS to give to Nancy !

I think I get the low response rate. The Maryland Ex Post Facto stuff won’t work for California. Probably a sore point. I shouldn’t have brought it up. Sorry. Maybe when Janis gets together with Nancy next month in Texas they can strategize some ideas for California.

I’m not seeing how anyone with a pre school education can think this is legal. These people have already paid their so called debt to society and now the state has been punishing them even more? Someone over there needs to teach them the difference between right and wrong. This lawsuit needs to succeed; these petty tyrants must be put in check. Their kind must stop rationalizing the law away and bending it past the breaking point.

Sorry to have to point this out, yet again.
The Registries are *not* about what they claim, much like the “Patriot Act”.
By cleverly defining the Registries as “Administrative Control Measures” these laws evade legal definition of Punishment, although they are punishing to say the least.

Registered Citizens are pariahs to be loathed at least and, preferably, persecuted wherever and whenever possible. It’s not too much of a stretch to imagine that somewhere somebody is working on a drone, pre-programmed with the GPS position of every registrant in your zip code and a gatling gun.

You are the whipping boy of a culture run-amok with sexual obsession; hated in a society that seeks to exterminate hate.

Get used to it. It will be this way forever regardless.

the law makers do make new laws regularly with no regard for constitutional or human rights
i to was convicted of a sex crime in 1990
4 years before the socalled megans law and have to register for the rest of my life every 3 months
have to tell my boss i need a day off or ill be in late because i have to go register
the truth is allot of people will not hire someone that has to register because of the reprocussions when it gets out the company hires sex offenders
i done all of my time i was given by the judge and though my time is complete and i have been off of parole for years and the law came into effect after i accepted my time
there has to be a way to get off of the registry that i am unconstitutionaly being placed on
if it was not punishment then the state should be coming by my house to register me or it would be done in my time on my schedual
it is double jeapordy because
1 it cost me gas to register
2 harder to find work when everyone knows you register
3 i lose time from work to go register every 90 days
4 i get looks from neighbors and know they conveinantly got online and see my picture
5 it was not part of my sentncing at the time i plead guilty or i may have took it to trial had i of known